Neuro-Ophthalmological Manifestations of Gangliogliomas
Gangliogliomas (GNG) are uncommon, comprising only 0.4% to 1.7% of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. GNG tend to occur in children and young adults and present predominately in the temporal and frontal lobes, with occasional cerebellar and spinal cord involvement. GNG are composed of both neuronal and glial cells.
The histological appearance of GNG consists of both neoplastic glial and ganglion cells. The glial cell components usually include fibrillary astrocytes with varying cellular atypia. The neuronal cells are typically clustered or irregularly oriented. Other common findings include fibrovascular stroma confined to the neuronal component, perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates, small foci of calcification, and positive synaptophysin, neuron-specific enolase, and chromogranin A markers. Aggressive GNG clinical behavior is associated with elevated Ki-67 and p53 labeling index.
History & Physical Examination
A comprehensive history is important when trying to diagnose the presence of an intracranial mass. This involves asking about the time course of symptom development and identifying symptoms of increased intracranial pressure (e.g. headaches, nausea, vomiting, pulsatile tinnitus, transient visual obscurations, diplopia). GNG are generally slow growing and associated with temporal lobe epilepsy, so the presence of these can be helpful when trying to identify the etiology. Although the typical course is gradual and slowly progressive, patients may present acutely with seizure or hydrocephalus.
A complete neuro-ophthalmologic exam is helpful to determine if there may be a mass present and if the GNG is impinging on any part of the afferent or efferent visual pathways. Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) can present with decreased visual acuity, relative afferent pupillary defect, sixth nerve palsy, or papilledema. The clinical features can be localizing (e.g., homonymous hemianopsia) or non-localizing signs of increased intracranial pressure.
Most GNG occur in the frontal or temporal lobe but there also have been at least eight prior reported cases of pineal region GNG. These pineal lesions can obstruct the cerebral aqueduct, resulting in hydrocephalus and can produce the dorsal midbrain syndrome (Parinaud syndrome). Pineal GNG can therefore produce vertical (typically up-gaze) paresis, light near dissociation of the pupils, convergence retraction nystagmus, and lid retraction (Collier sign).
When any potential intracranial mass is suspected, it is crucial to perform diagnostic imaging, including a cranial contrast tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium. The imaging features of GNG are variable and nonspecific but may show a partially cystic mass. Up to 30% of GNG have calcifications and 40% of cases demonstrate a mural enhancing nodule. Associated vasogenic edema is not a typical finding associated with GNG and significant brain edema should suggest either an alternative diagnosis or potential anaplastic transformation of GNG.
Because pineal lesions can be due to germ cell tumors, serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis for tumor markers (e.g., alpha-fetoprotein, beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, placental alkaline phosphatase, and lactose dehydrogenase) may be considered in the differential diagnosis of pineal GNG.
The differential diagnosis of GNG includes dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor, oligodendroglioma, and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma.
Gross total surgical excision is the preferred treatment for GNG. Lang et al. reported a GNG series showing 5- and 10-year survival rates of 89% and 83% when total resection was achieved. Cases with only partial resection should undergo serial neuroimaging but GNG has a very slow growth rate. Radiation and adjuvant chemotherapy are not typically used in the management of GNG except in cases of high-grade tumor or anaplastic transformation.
The prognosis of GNG is generally good. The majority of GNG are histologically benign (WHO grade 1) but up to 5% of GNG are higher grade tumors (WHO grade 3). Older age at diagnosis, male sex, and malignant histological features are poor prognostic factors.
GNG are rare tumors of the CNS which are composed of both glial and neural tissue. Although uncommon, GNG can be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with afferent or efferent ophthalmologic complaints that may be localizing or non-localizing. Although most GNG occur in the temporal lobe, pineal and cerebellar GNG have also been reported. Gross total surgical resection is the best treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy are reserved for residual or recurrent higher grade GNG. The prognosis for GNG is generally good and the histopathology is usually WHO Grade 1.
- Faillot T, Sichez JP, Capelle L, Kujas M, Fohanno D. Ganglioglioma of the pineal region: case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 1998;49(1):104-108. doi:10.1016/s0090-3019(97)00302-9
- Tokoro K, Chiba Y, Ohtani T, Abe H, Yagishita S. Pineal ganglioglioma in a patient with familial basal ganglia calcification and elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein: case report. Neurosurgery. 1993;33(3):506-511. doi:10.1227/00006123-199309000-00023
- Oppenheimer DC, Johnson MD, Judkins AR. Ganglioglioma of the Spinal Cord. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2015;5:53. Published 2015 Sep 30. doi:10.4103/2156-7514.166355
- Borja MJ, Plaza MJ, Altman N, Saigal G. Conventional and advanced MRI features of pediatric intracranial tumors: supratentorial tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(5):W483-W503. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9724
- Carr C, O'Neill BE, Hochhalter CB, Strong MJ, Ware ML. Biomarkers of Pineal Region Tumors: A Review. Ochsner J. 2019;19(1):26-31. doi:10.31486/toj.18.0110
- Shin JH, Lee HK, Khang SK, et al. Neuronal tumors of the central nervous system: radiologic findings and pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2002;22(5):1177-1189. doi:10.1148/radiographics.22.5.g02se051177
- Lang FF, Epstein FJ, Ransohoff J, et al. Central nervous system gangliogliomas. Part 2: Clinical outcome. J Neurosurg. 1993;79(6):867-873. doi:10.3171/jns.1993.79.6.0867