Malar / Midface Descent

From EyeWiki

All content on Eyewiki is protected by copyright law and the Terms of Service. This content may not be reproduced, copied, or put into any artificial intelligence program, including large language and generative AI models, without permission from the Academy.


Original contributors: Oliveira K, Jaber J, Han J, Yazdian A, Huang A, Yen MT

Disease Entity

Midface/Malar Descent results from age related changes in the skeletal and soft tissue structures of the midface region. Particularly, the effects of gravity and repeated facial expressions can weaken the ligaments in the malar region, which can lead to the vertical descent of the malar fat pad which can contribute to lower eyelid retraction, tear trough deformities, deepened nasolabial folds, and volume loss accompanied with a tired appearance.

Background

General Anatomy of Midface Malar region: When discussing physical characteristics arising from malar descent, it is important to understand the anatomy of the lower eyelid and cheek. There are two anatomical regions that are responsible for providing structural support, including the junction between the eyelid and cheek, as well as the midcheek. More specifically, the lid-cheek junction is located at the orbital rim, where the orbitalmalar ligament is visualized. It should be noted that the orbitalmalar ligament provides the separation between the lower eyelid and malar eminence, and is marked as the upper border where festoons generally develop.[1] Conversely, the lower border is within the midcheek, including both the malar septum and zygomaticocutaneous ligament where festoons often develop.[1] The malar septum spans the region between the inferior orbital rim to where it inserts within the midcheek dermis. Underneath this region is supported by the zygomaticocutaneous ligament. Lastly, preperiosteal fat and suborbicularis oculi fat make up the two layers of fat within the prezygomatic space (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

Figure 1. Anatomy of the prezygomatic space. (Figure courtesy of Kristen Oliveira)
Figure 2. Sagittal section of the prezygomatic space. (Figure Courtesy of Kristen Oliveira)

The aging process induces notable changes in the soft tissue, skin, and skeletal structures within the midface region.[2] Gravitational effects and repeated facial expressions weaken the ligaments in the region, including the orbicularis retaining ligaments and zygomaticocutaneous ligament.[2][3] [4] These changes lead to a vertical descent of the malar fat pad, the suborbicularis oculi fat (SOOF) pad, and the lower eyelid.[2] The descent of the midface tissues can lead to shortening of the anterior lamellae (skin and orbicularis muscle) of the lower eyelid, resulting in lower eyelid retraction. Moreover, a descending malar fat pad that pulls on the lateral canthal tendon can cause round eye and scleral show.[5]

Atrophy of the SOOF and malar fat pads also accompany this vertical descent.[2] These processes can contribute to the following changes to facial volume and physical appearance:

  • Tear trough deformity[2]
  • Deepened nasolabial fold[2]
  • Jowl formation on mandibular line[4][6]
  • Volume loss in infraorbital region and development of a tired appearance[2] [4]

Etiology

Midface/Malar Descent results from age related changes in the skeletal and soft tissue structures of the midface region. Particularly, the effects of gravity and repeated facial expressions can weaken the ligaments in the malar region, which can lead to the vertical descent of the malar fat pad which can contribute to lower eyelid retraction, tear trough deformities, deepened nasolabial folds, and volume loss accompanied with a tired appearance.

Surgical Therapy

The treatment for malar descent is highly variable due to differences in the severity of descent and preferences of patients.

Midface Elevation Surgery

Midface elevation surgery, or midface lift, is a broad term that encompasses surgical interventions that primarily aim to correct descent of the midface. Midface elevation typically involves redraping tissues and release of retaining ligaments, which include the orbicularis retaining ligament (ORL), zygomaticocutaneous ligament (ZCL), and malar septum (MS). [7] In addition to correcting descent of the midface, the midface lift can also be a useful adjunct in correcting lower eyelid malpositions. Midface elevation surgery is appropriate for lower eyelid ectropion and retraction caused by shortening of the anterior lamella, which could be a result of aging-related midface descent, skin removal during a previous blepharoplasty, tumor resection, or a heavy midface due to paralysis. A midface lift can allow for the repositioning of skin and orbicularis muscle to the eyelid, leading to better eyelid position.[8] A midface lift may be performed in conjunction with a canthoplexy/canthoplasty to improve eyelid positioning and tension.[5] There is variation in the initial point of incision, with the most common incision points including temporal, buccal sulcus, transconjunctival, and subciliary incisions. Subperiosteal midface elevation can correct midface descent in patients with moderate to severe midface ptosis. One approach to the subperiosteal midface lift uses a temporal incision to access the midface structures, and the arcus marginalis, periosteal attachments to the zygomatic arch, zygomaticus major and minor muscular attachments are released. Then, midface soft tissues are suspended and sutured to the temporalis fascia.[2] Alternatively, supraperiosteal elevation is utilized for patients with mild to moderate midface ptosis and involves a more superficial dissection than the other techniques. Additional surgical approaches include the transblepharoplasty midface lift and extended blepharoplasty, which are appropriate for moderate to severe midface descent.[7]

Complications

The overall complication rate for midface elevation surgery has been estimated to be 15-19%.[7] Edema is commonly experienced after midface elevation surgery. Prolonged edema can be minimized using cold compresses, oral steroids, lymphatic massage, or homeopathic treatments.[7][9] Asymmetry is another common complication of midface elevation surgery, which may require further surgical correction in significant cases.[10] Additionally, midface elevation may result in cutaneous scarring, infection, malposition of the lower eyelid, and hematoma.[10] The subperiosteal approach may result in more prolonged edema and longer healing times compared to the supraperiosteal midface lift.[8]

Prognosis

Treatment for Midface/Malar descent can reduce the lower eyelid retraction and age-related appearance of a patient, with excellent prognosis and minimal complications. In a retrospective study of 199 patients that underwent midface lifting, improvement in eyelid retraction was observed in 97.9% of cases in both functional and aesthetic terms. There was a reduction in excessive tearing, blurred vision, ocular discomfort, redness, burning, and photophobia in the majority of patients 12 months after surgery.[5] Another retrospective study of subperiosteal midface lift outcomes in 34 patients found that the surgery is effective in improving lower eyelid position and lagophthalmos.[11] As with other eyelid surgeries, patients may not be completely satisfied with the procedure results and require another surgery to further correct the malar descent. In one study citing the re-elevation rates of 472 patients following malar fat pad elevation, 14 patients underwent a second elevation surgery. The indicators for re-elevation included malar fat pad asymmetry, malar fat pad malposition, and nasolabial asymmetry. Following the second elevation surgery (which included SMAS procedures combined with other operations), the re-elevating of the fat pad was successfully achieved with minimal complications.[12] It is important for physicians and patients to express questions regarding the benefits of the surgery and the expected results. Midface elevation does not change upper brow and eyelid appearance nor replace volume augmentation, and although symmetry is the goal, patients should expect asymmetry due to congenital differences in skeletal and soft tissue structures.[12] By managing both patient expectations and treatment limitations, treatment for malar descent can be gratifying for both the patient and physician.


Summary

Midface/Malar Descent results from age related changes in the skeletal and soft tissue structures of the midface region. Particularly, the effects of gravity and repeated facial expressions can weaken the ligaments in the malar region, which can lead to the vertical descent of the malar fat pad which can contribute to lower eyelid retraction, tear trough deformities, deepened nasolabial folds, and volume loss accompanied with a tired appearance. Treatment for descent of the malar fat pad and associated lower eyelid retraction depends on its severity, with surgical management including subperiosteal midface elevation, supraperiosteal midface elevation, and transblepharoplasty midface lift. Overall treatment for malar descent has an excellent prognosis, however complications can include edema, asymmetry, and malposition.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Mendelson BC, Muzaffar AR, Adams WP Jr. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek and malar mounds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Sep 1;110(3):885-96; discussion 897-911. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200209010-00026. PMID: 12172155.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 Yeh CC, Williams EF. Midface restoration in the management of the lower eyelid. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America. 2010;18(3):365-374. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2010.04.001
  3. Liao H-T. Lower eyelid and midface rejuvenation. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America. 2021;29(4):497-509. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2021.06.003
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 De la Torre J, Martin S, Vasconez L. Suture suspension of the Malar Fat Pad. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2002;22(5):446-450. doi:10.1067/maj.2002.128624
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Goldberg RA. Discussion: Vertical Midface Lifting with Periorbital Anchoring in the Management of Lower Eyelid Retraction: A 10-Year Clinical Retrospective Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jul;140(1):46-48. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003490. PMID: 28654585.
  6. DeFatta RJ, Williams EF. Evolution of midface rejuvenation. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery. 2009;11(1):6-12. doi:10.1001/archfaci.11.1.6
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 Newberry CI, Mccrary H, Thomas JR, Cerrati EW. Updated Management of Malar Edema, Mounds, and Festoons: A Systematic Review. Aesthet Surg J. 2020;40(3):246-258. doi:10.1093/asj/sjz137
  8. 8.0 8.1 Chung JE, Yen MT. Midface lifting as an adjunct procedure in ectropion repair. Ann Plast Surg. 2007 Dec;59(6):635-40. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000260815.89818.31. PMID: 18046143.
  9. Tao JP, Aakalu VK, Freitag SK, Sobel RK, Foster JA, Wladis EJ, McCulley TJ, Yen MT. Homeopathic Agents or Vitamins in Reducing Ecchymosis after Oculofacial Surgery: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2022;129(2):220-226. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.05.018. PMID: 34176651.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Yin VT, Chou E, Nakra T. The transeyelid midface lift. Clin Plast Surg. 2015;42(1):95-101. doi:10.1016/j.cps.2014.09.004
  11. Ben Simon GJ, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. Subperiosteal midface lift with or without a hard palate mucosal graft for correction of lower eyelid retraction. Ophthalmology. 2006 Oct;113(10):1869-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.014. Epub 2006 Aug 1. PMID: 16884780.
  12. 12.0 12.1 De la Torre JI, Rosenberg LZ, De Cordier BC, Gardner PM, Fix RJ, Vasconez LO. Clinical analysis of malar fat pad re-elevation. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50(3):244-248. doi:10.1097/01.sap.0000046805.53878.c8
The Academy uses cookies to analyze performance and provide relevant personalized content to users of our website.