Clinical Trials in Medical Retina
Protocol W 2021
Maturi RK, Glassman AR, Josic K, Antoszyk AN, Blodi BA, Jampol LM, Marcus DM, Martin DF, Melia M, Salehi-Had H, Stockdale CR, Punjabi OS, Sun JK; DRCR Retina Network. Effect of Intravitreous Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor vs Sham Treatment for Prevention of Vision-Threatening Complications of Diabetic Retinopathy: The Protocol W Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 1;139(7):701-712. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0606. PMID: 33784735; PMCID: PMC8010644.
Objectives
The goal was to determine the efficacy of intravitreous aflibercept injections compared to sham in preventing potentially vision-threatening complications in eyes with moderate to severe NPDR. The role of anti-VEGF in managing NPDR without center-involved diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) has not been established.
Design
Clinical trial, eyes with moderate to severe NPDR without CI-DME were randomized to receive 2.0 mg aflibercept or sham. Treatment was given at baseline; 1, 2, and 4 months; and every 4 months through 2 years. Between 2 and 4 years, treatment was deferred if the eye had mild NPDR or better. Aflibercept was administered in both groups if CI-DME with vision loss (≥10 letters at 1 visit or 5-9 letters at 2 consecutive visits) or high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) developed.
Main outcomes measures
Development of CI-DME with vision loss or PDR.
Results
From 2016 to 2020, 328 participants (399 eyes) with moderate to severe NPDR without CI-DME were randomized to aflibercept injections (n = 200) or sham (n = 199). The 2-year cumulative probability of developing CI-DME with vision loss or PDR was 16.3% with aflibercept vs. 43.5% with sham. The 2-year cumulative probability of developing PDR was 13.5% in the aflibercept group vs. 33.2% in the sham, and the 2-year cumulative probability of developing CI-DME with vision loss was 4.1% in the aflibercept group vs. 14.8% in the sham group. The mean (SD) change in VA from baseline to 2 years was not significant, -0.9 (5.8) letters with aflibercept and -2.0 (6.1) letters with sham.
Limitations
20% loss of follow-up.
Conclusions
Eyes with moderate to severe NPDR treatment with periodic aflibercept decreased the development of PDR or vision-reducing CI-DME. However, through 2 years, preventive aflibercept did not confer VA benefit compared with observation plus treatment with aflibercept only after development of PDR or vision-reducing CI-DME.
Pearls for clinical practice
Eyes with moderate to severe NPDR can be observed and treated if required.
